Had a chance to chat with some good spinmeisters on Twitter…the legal gooo that is liberal Marxist types that spin and use case law instead of real laws..that use spin and fear tactics as if they give a shit about people…so after being spun and twisted yesterday I consider my debate with several legal minds on Twitter and wanted to sleep on it…I have to admit they are good at putting up false fronts and narratives…
So I had some epoxy work to do on the boat and took my time to rethink the whole exchange as I am or try to be even-handed and not as political as some think…as an independent…that leans conservative…I am not tied to one party…I am (to be clear) a Trump supporter… he ended wars, brought American prisoners and troops home, the poor and middle class, those AMERICANS that are the heart of this country both did better percentage-wise then the rich, closed the gap between rich and poor and all Americans did better and had more money to enjoy….so not apologizing for supporting the one person in government so far I saw work for the every day American no matter their ethnic or religious or political differences….so to twitter debaters who will say are MASTERBATERS, I mean master-debaters….sorry a Freudian slip there, not but at least I am honest when being a prick unlike some on twitter….
To twitter legal posters…
As a platform a side should not be picked, if you are a platform and get protected it is from what the 3rd party says only. As a publisher If you defame or slander or Libel you should not be protected. And as a publisher you have the right to pick sides and be responsible for your actions. I disagree that it is acting as a platform and abuses those protections…I am staying with they are at risk of being sued for deformation …
The attorneys I chatted with yesterday are great at muddying the waters…Like liberals always do…they start using things such as case law instead of actual LAW…we saw that reflected as the correction for R-V-W overturned ..so claiming some case in uber-liberal here or there got thrown out so what…that is in fact the corruption….bad practices happen all the time …Laws get overturned all the time…people take advantage of laws all the time…
Also the whole not fair to up-and-coming platforms….well it didn’t help Parler, or Truth, or Gettr….in fact the bad actors that run the infrastructure had no problem shutting down dropping support etc based entirely on politics. so the whole we need to protect up-and-coming platforms is a farce. what they mean is they want a monopoly of one thought propaganda…
Like me an independent and others on all sides question recent actions. It is evident that the mood of and people of this great country…are sick and tired of the one-way government.,…using bad actors and bad practices as some sort of proof they are right does not fly with me or about 70 million others as of the last election and now I would say we have picked up about another 10 to 20 million…especially after the breach of protocol at Mar-A-Lago the communist like actions of the KGB, I mean the FBI, was not warranted and these so-called platforms are only showing one side yet they use protection of 230 to silence truth and facts…
I would like to thank the liberal attorneys for solidifying my intent to keep pushing for the loss of section 230 to protect platforms of actions as publishers while claiming they are platforms yet pick winners and losers with false accusations, I am going to call that libel exactly what it is, willful defamation, of a publisher usurping the protections of a platform…
We will see what happens after the next two elections…this is going to be the long game against Marxist types that use our own laws in a bastardized way from immigration through first amendment rights and using things like NGOs…no more Non-Governmental-Organizations… let’s cast a light on who they are how they get funding and who they support with that funding to be transparent…Americans should know if they are funding their own enslavement…
I do thank the few that spoke openly and sanely…we just don’t agree.